ram·ble (verb): A walk for pleasure, typically without a definite route; To talk or write at length in a confused or inconsequential way.
Dear Joseph Epstein
16 December 2020
I am just emailing to thank you for your bravery in calling out Jill Biden’s arrogance in daring to label herself a doctor. As you say, ‘A wise man once said that no one should call himself “Dr” unless he has delivered a child’. Exactly. Only real doctors deliver children. Okay, sure, these days only obstetricians qualify for that description – midwives too, but they don’t count because they’re women. Plus, you were clearly being metaphoric – just like when you say that anyone with a PhD who refers to themselves as ‘Dr’ is ‘bush league’ (a.k.a. female).
My scholarly publishing history
22 August 2018
What follows is an annotated bibliography of my publishing history where I aim to provide an honest account of every peer-reviewed manuscript I’ve written, including the ones that didn’t get published, the ones that took years and endless rounds of reviews to get published, and the ones that probably shouldn’t have been published at all. I’ve written this partly for people starting out, for whom the path to publication is often a demoralizing one and where it’s easy to assume that people who are more advanced in their careers have had to struggle less
The rise of content
29 March 2017
Within the field of publishing today, one word crops up repeatedly: ‘content’. Content, we are told, is what publishers do. They solicit it, edit it, package it and distribute it. Although the term has become so pervasive that most people don’t give it a second thought, the framing of publishing as a form of content production is a recent shift – one that’s largely a twenty-first century phenomenon. For this reason, it’s worth reflecting on how and why this concept became ascendant.
Changing conceptions of 'the reader' in trade publishing
12 February 2017
The Reader has been imagined in many ways over the centuries by the varied players with a stake in understanding her – publishers, literary and cultural theorists, national policy makers, and so on. However, one discipline has increasingly come to dominate conceptions of the Reader, at least within the arena of trade publishing: marketing.
Reflections on Academia.edu
17 October 2016
Scholarly journals are of the few areas in the publishing sector where substantial profits are made. Ironically, publications that are some of the least expensive to produce are the most expensive to purchase – mostly because of the pool of free labour academics provide in writing content and ensuring its quality, and the existence of a captive market (i.e., universities) forced to purchase products at whatever price publishers choose to charge. This situation has led the science reporter George Monbiot to quip that academic publishers make ‘WalMart look like a corner shop and Rupert Murdoch look like a socialist’
Responding to academic spam
9 June 2016
On a daily basis, I receive literally dozens of emails from 'academic' publishers and conferences inviting me to submit a paper or speak at their event. For the most part, these invitations are laughably dodgy - to the extent that I have previously felt compelled to provide some advice on how they might attempt to look more credible. However, I do believe that the email I received this morning from Insight Conferences might win the prize for the dodgiest invitation ever.
Second Republican candidate responds to claims about imminent threat to America
12 April 2016
My opponent wants you to believe that no one else cares about the coming bird apocalypse. But the truth of the matter is that the bird apocalypse has already happened and I’ve been talking about it for years. As a Canadian-born lifelong defender of the American Constitution, I can definitively say that the bird apocalypse began in 1973.
Candidate talks about new threat to America
8 April 2016
I wanna talk to you about what’s happening to our country. Our country is in serious trouble. I’m not prejudiced. Anyone who knows me knows I’m not prejudiced, but let’s be honest here: they are ruining America. Every year they come here. They’re mostly not from here but they come here in waves and they shit all over us. I mean, they literally shit all over us. Plus, they’re horrible, they’re disgusting. Some of them, I assume, are decent, but most of them carry diseases.
9 December 2015
When I discovered you a couple of years ago, I was immediately enamoured. Here was a website dedicated to the principles of open access that would enable me to share my research with members of the public. Here was a site that allowed me to control my profile and add and delete material at will—unlike my own academic institution, where adding a paper or updating my profile is a task so unwieldy and complicated, I rarely bother. Here was a site that would expose me to the work of academics I might otherwise never have heard of. Plus, it looked like the younger, hipper sibling of ResearchGate, which, as far as I could ascertain, was populated primarily by nerdy scientists.
Dear Knowledge Translation Media
30 April 2015
I was very excited to receive your email invitation this morning and I’m sorry to hear that you’ve been trying unsuccessfully to reach me by phone. It’s so flattering to know that I am one of only a “small selected number of researchers and institutes around the globe” you’ve approached with your exciting offer to translate my research.
What I actually said about Apple product launches
9 October 2014
In October 2012, a reporter got in touch asking if I would be willing to provide some comments for an article she was writing on Apple product launches to precede the unveiling of the iPad Mini. I had been recommended to her, she indicated, based on a satiric piece I’d written for the AAA Blog on how to deliver papers at anthropology conferences. She was looking for an anthropologist willing to provide some “light hearted and fun” comments on the “culture of Apple product launch events”.
Dear dodgy open access journals
12 September 2014
Every morning I open up my email with a sense of anticipation. Who will I receive an invitation from today? Will it be Obesity Research, which is a topic at least tangentially related to stuff I have actually published on, or the International Journal of Marine Science and Ocean Technology, which has clearly not bothered to do its homework. However, I can’t help feel, dodgy open access journals, that you’ve stopped even pretending to look legitimate.
Letter to Ann Coulter
7 August 2014
You and I don’t see eye to eye on many things (well, most things; probably 99% of things), but I want to take the opportunity to thank you for opening my eyes to the true nature of soccer. Now I should confess up front that I’m not an American (or even an ‘American’), so I know my opinion doesn’t count, but your recent columns spoke to me on a gut level. Actually, even lower – more like the bowel region.